Harry Kewell, the
Under the headline “Kewell move made me feel ashamed of the game”, Lineker criticised the
Kewell alleges that Lineker defamed him in the article and is claiming damages for libel, including aggravated damages. He contends that the item discredited him because it suggested that he had participated willingly in a dishonourable and financially dubious transfer from Leeds to
In addition, Kewell, 26, says that the piece showed him as a cunning and disloyal player who had circumvented the transfer negotiation rules.
In the article, Lineker suggested that football clubs needed to revert to dealing directly with one another and not through agents, if the transfer system was to remain intact. However, Kewell says that his agent’s £2 million fee was reasonable because Mandic had yet to be paid for extensive work undertaken over the previous three years.
In his article, Lineker argues that agents have the power to put deals in jeopardy, unless their needs are satisfied, which, according to the pundit, is wrong.
The Telegraph Group denies that the article was defamatory in the way that Kewell has alleged.
Kewell is also claiming an injunction restraining the defendants from repeating the allegedly defamatory views.
Lineker and the Telegraph Group said that they had no comment to make before the case. Mandic said that neither he nor his client would be doing any interviews before the start of the new season.
A hearing is scheduled for tomorrow in the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court.